| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Game 1: Columbus was doing OK, until Detroit started scoring goals.
Game 2: And the scoring continues...
Game 3: Did Columbus really outplay Detroit? 1 game away from an annihilation.
Game 4: As WhoWins.com says, Columbus has been annihilated.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The only question I ask about this series: can Detroit's amazing offense make up for their terrible goaltending?
3 comments:
interesting that the expected goals were so close. i wonder why.
ironic that goaltending was skewed in favor of detroit.
nevertheless, to my eye detroit dominated the jackets territorially. they outshot them 28-12 at ES.
Breakdown:
Game1:
DET: EV: 2.13, PP: 0.39, SH: 0.05
CBJ: EV: 0.95, PP: 1.06, SH: 0.06
EV shots are less valuable than PP shots.
19 Detroit shots were >40 feet (0.88 EG)
7 Columbus shots were >40 feet (0.34 EG)
cool! thanks for the breakdown.
Post a Comment