Southeast Expecations - 2009

I tried these little tables last season with a little success (and some failures). That being said, I think these tables give a good impression (even if you don't like how the numbers line up) of what each team will look like. I've color coded this year: red = 10% below average for that category. Green = 10% above average for that category. I've excluded PK, Goaltending though.



















The little arrows indicate whether there is a substantial change in the team's expected points from last season (more than 10 difference).

Note: These include RFA's who haven't signed yet.

Northeast Expectations - 2009

I tried these little tables last season with a little success (and some failures). That being said, I think these tables give a good impression (even if you don't like how the numbers line up) of what each team will look like. I've color coded this year: red = 10% below average for that category. Green = 10% above average for that category. I've excluded PK, Goaltending though.



















The little arrows indicate whether there is a substantial change in the team's expected points from last season (more than 10 difference).

Note: These include RFA's who haven't signed yet.

Atlantic Expectations - 2009

I tried these little tables last season with a little success (and some failures). That being said, I think these tables give a good impression (even if you don't like how the numbers line up) of what each team will look like. I've color coded this year: red = 10% below average for that category. Green = 10% above average for that category. I've excluded PK, Goaltending though.



















The little arrows indicate whether there is a substantial change in the team's expected points from last season (more than 10 difference).

Note: These include RFA's who haven't signed yet.

Pacific Expectations - 2009

I tried these little tables last season with a little success (and some failures). That being said, I think these tables give a good impression (even if you don't like how the numbers line up) of what each team will look like. I've color coded this year: red = 10% below average for that category. Green = 10% above average for that category. I've excluded PK, Goaltending though.



















The little arrows indicate whether there is a substantial change in the team's expected points from last season (more than 10 difference).

Note: These include RFA's who haven't signed yet.

Northwest Expectations - 2009

I tried these little tables last season with a little success (and some failures). That being said, I think these tables give a good impression (even if you don't like how the numbers line up) of what each team will look like. I've color coded this year: red = 10% below average for that category. Green = 10% above average for that category. I've excluded PK, Goaltending though.



















The little arrows indicate whether there is a substantial change in the team's expected points from last season (more than 10 difference).

Note: These include RFA's who haven't signed yet.

Central Expectations - 2009

I tried these little tables last season with a little success (and some failures). That being said, I think these tables give a good impression (even if you don't like how the numbers line up) of what each team will look like. I've color coded this year: red = 10% below average for that category. Green = 10% above average for that category. I've excluded PK, Goaltending though.



















The little arrows indicate whether there is a substantial change in the team's expected points from last season (more than 10 difference).

Note: These include RFA's who haven't signed yet.