Based on the expected offense from the tables presented in the other posts, this would be the expected standings. There seems to be a lot of volatility in the east, but the west appears to be business as usual (changes smaller than 10 are not really that significant)
Western Standings
| N | Team | 2007 | 2008 | D | | 1 | Detroit Red Wings | 115 | 113 | -2 | | 2 | Anaheim Ducks | 102 | 101 | -1 | | 3 | San Jose Sharks | 107 | 98 | -9 | | 4 | Vancouver Canucks | 88 | 94 | 6 | | 5 | Dallas Stars | 97 | 94 | -3 | | 6 | Colorado Avalanche | 95 | 93 | -2 | | 7 | Calgary Flames | 94 | 90 | -4 | | 8 | Minnesota Wild | 98 | 89 | -9 | | 9 | Chicago Blackhawks | 88 | 89 | 1 | | 10 | Edmonton Oilers | 88 | 88 | 0 | | 11 | Nashville Predators | 91 | 85 | -6 | | 12 | St. Louis Blues | 79 | 79 | 0 | | 13 | Phoenix Coyotes | 83 | 79 | -4 | | 14 | Columbus Blue Jackets | 80 | 78 | -2 | | 15 | Los Angeles Kings | 71 | 72 | 1 |
|
Eastern Standings
| N | Team | 2007 | 2008 | D | | 1 | Washington Capitals | 94 | 116 | 22 | | 2 | Pittsburgh Penguins | 102 | 108 | 6 | | 3 | Montreal Canadiens | 104 | 104 | 0 | | 4 | New Jersey Devils | 99 | 101 | 2 | | 5 | New York Rangers | 97 | 98 | 1 | | 6 | Buffalo Sabres | 90 | 97 | 7 | | 7 | Tampa Bay Lightning | 71 | 94 | 23 | | 8 | Ottawa Senators | 94 | 93 | -1 | | 9 | Florida Panthers | 85 | 89 | 4 | | 10 | Philadelphia Flyers | 95 | 88 | -7 | | 11 | Carolina Hurricanes | 92 | 88 | -4 | | 12 | Boston Bruins | 94 | 80 | -14 | | 13 | Toronto Maple Leafs | 83 | 80 | -3 | | 14 | Atlanta Thrashers | 76 | 77 | 1 | | 15 | New York Islanders | 79 | 76 | -3 |
|
I think it's worth saying I'm not very satisfied with the results, but I like the method. There are a few things I still need to work out, especially in terms of Crosby and Ovechkin's offense. I also need to look at Tampa a little bit closer ( they are expected to score 300 GF - a little bit unrealistic).